Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: > Did you test your logic changes with a non-Tetroid GC inside a QL where > the original logic did *not* work reliably? > > I'm asking, because IIRC you reported total failure of the original > logic with the Tetroid GC, while my experience was, that non-Tetroid GC > always basically worked, just not reliably in some QLs.
As far as I could gather in my limited tests, INGOT 5 never worked (which includes the Tetroid) and INGOT 6 worked or at least mostly worked. Difficult to tell because the software had a few remaining issues, too, but I haven't been able to crash it or corrupt any data for a few days so I consider it stable now. > That would mean conclusions from Tetroid to non-Tetroid is not > possible. Original INGOT 5 GCs were tested and started to work, too. Not with the latest logic that includes the SGC fix, but the GC fix alone already worked for them and if anything the latest version should make it even more stable. > As for the daughter board, why do you want to re-design it? Using the push-to-eject style daughter boards is a lot cheaper and easier to do than your original design. Besides, I don't have your original designs ;) Only problem is that the card cannot be centered in the MDV drive with them, which bothers me a bit but is difficult to change due to the positions of the screws. Also, dual-slot would be cool. > Will you upload your logic changes to the QL-SD section of Dilwyn's site? Eventually, sure. All the best, Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List