[ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop

[Christopher Cave]

In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the rapid responses. I guess the problem is that I have not 
really tried to write more than a handful of lines in SBasic before and 
expected the behaviour of 'continue' in C. I can see that in an 
interpreter defining NEXT as in SBasic (which embraces the loop test) is 
rather easier then a pairing such as:

IF condn. THEN GOTO label
. 
. 
. 
label : END FOR i

Still don't like it tho.

Christopher Cave