Yes,but what I dont understand is how the "n" value in my example can be OK
when the INT(n) does not ?!
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Malcolm Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoy� : lundi 18 juin 2001 11:30
� : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop
Yes rather annoying. I've come across this problem several times. I
quite often
add a small value to n solve it. i.e. INT(n+0.00001). I assume its got
something
to do with internal rounding.
Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
> As I see a question about FOR/NEXT loops, I have mine:
> the subsequent peice of code gives me an unexpected result
> FOR n = 2.95 to 3.05 STEP 0.01 : print n, INT(n)
> Why ?
>
> Claude
> (I am using QPC2v2.00 and SMSQ/e v2.98)
>
>
