On 6/18/01 at 3:44 PM Claude Mourier 00 wrote: >Thank's a lot for all the answers. But this is quite annoying : especially >because behavior is not the same for PRINT and INT. Better if PRINT returns >something like 2.99999 (in fact SMS loves exponential form I personaly >hate). I'm not sure but I think even FDEC$(n, 9, 8) returns 3.00000. > >Claude No, it's Print. Eventually, you have to print it and that's where the rounding happens. FDEC$ does an implicit print, so again you cannot escape rounding. The only way would be to get the actual float representation from memory as 6 bytes and convert them 'manually'. Nastan
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Christopher Cave
- [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Dave Walker
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Steve Howe
