Yes rather annoying. I've come across this problem several times. I quite often add a small value to n solve it. i.e. INT(n+0.00001). I assume its got something to do with internal rounding. Claude Mourier 00 wrote: > As I see a question about FOR/NEXT loops, I have mine: > the subsequent peice of code gives me an unexpected result > FOR n = 2.95 to 3.05 STEP 0.01 : print n, INT(n) > Why ? > > Claude > (I am using QPC2v2.00 and SMSQ/e v2.98) > >
- [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Christopher Cave
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Thierry Godefroy
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Robert Newson
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Christopher Cave
- [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Malcolm Lear
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
