Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop

[Marcel Kilgus]

Laurence Reeves wrote: 
> Except... I have this vague memory that TT was going to make FOR loops
> hold onto the initially supplied values, evaluate how many steps they
> looked as if they needed to do, then do exactly that many, scaling the
> variable to neat values along the way. Maybe he didn't.

As far as I can tell from a 10 minute study of the SBASIC sources he
still uses the method you described for QDOS/Minerva (10 minutes
aren't really enough to completely understand that code, but I think I
got an impression ;-).

Cheers, Marcel