Thank's a lot for your work. I think it would be a good idea to store the result somewhere for all the community. Because I still think this behavior is not obvious and can generate unexpected results and frustrations. Claude -----Message d'origine----- De : P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : mardi 19 juin 2001 17:25 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop SMSQ/E, and I think Qdos also, operates with (at least) four different rounding schemes: etc.
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Dave Walker
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Claude Mourier 00
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Steve Howe
- [ql-users] Q40/Q60 Giorgio Garabello
- RE: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Laurence Reeves
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Marcel Kilgus
- RE: Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Mel LaVerne
- Re: [ql-users] NEXT in FOR-loop Tony Firshman