On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:25:08PM +0100, Norman Dunbar wrote: > Our company is looking into a standard disclaimer, but have found them to be > useless, irritating (how many one line jokes have you had with about 2 Gigs > worth of disclaimers !) and not legally binding. I suspect the MD will still > go ahead anyway - his managerial style is based on that of Dilbert's boss > :o) there was a "contest" for the longest disclaimer not long ago, some US lawyers won with about 6.5 KB worth of disclaimers. What a surprise ;) Bye Richard
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Robert Klein
- RE: [ql-users] Virus Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Wolfgang Lenerz
- RE: Re: [ql-users] Virus Ian . Pine
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Richard Zidlicky
- RE: Re: [ql-users] Virus Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Adrian Vickers
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Bill Waugh
