Phoebus Dokos wrote: > and don't forget the "ArmQL" coming out soon :-) (Especially the XScale > version using as core emulation engine uQLx could easily outperform both > QPC2 and Q60) (Or at least that's what preliminary test have shown Dave > IIRC :-)
Well, regarding that: a) why should an Arm based uQLx be faster than an x86 based uQLx? x86 is approaching the 3GHz frontier. b) I can tell you that there aren't thousands of QPC users out there and even less Qx0 users, so how big could a potential ArmQL user base be in the end? I say that a value with 3 digits is already a big goal. OK, finally off to bed, Marcel
