At 11:09 �� 11/3/2002, you wrote: >Phoebus Dokos wrote: > > and don't forget the "ArmQL" coming out soon :-) (Especially the XScale > > version using as core emulation engine uQLx could easily outperform both > > QPC2 and Q60) (Or at least that's what preliminary test have shown Dave > > IIRC :-) > >Well, regarding that: > >a) why should an Arm based uQLx be faster than an x86 based uQLx? x86 >is approaching the 3GHz frontier.
Because ARM IS faster (and with X-Scale's at 1 GHz coming up I don't even THINK that a 2 GHz can come close) >b) I can tell you that there aren't thousands of QPC users out there >and even less Qx0 users, so how big could a potential ArmQL user base >be in the end? I say that a value with 3 digits is already a big goal. Not really because due to its platform the ArmQL CAN be used as a QL but not only for that, it can run RiscOS, Linux / Net(Open) BSD and even PalmOS :-) (V. 5 and above)... and with a potential for handheld operation as well :-) (Or industrial apps etc. etc. etc...) >OK, finally off to bed, Marcel > G'night! >--- >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. �� ����������� ������ ����� >�������� ���. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.333 / Virus Database: 187 - Release Date: 8/3/2002
