Hi Mike,
> Jochen says that Q60 and QPC are not QLs, that may be > so, but to me anything I can run QL software on qualifies as a > QL. and should be supported. Correct. Everything should be supported, I stated this several times in several emails. But, as clarified before, you missed out Marcel in the first sentence, and also in the next one - if 'QL' is everything that can run QL software, then I think Marcel counts here very much too: Quoting you: "So, from a user point of view, Peter Graf seems to be the one with most at stake, his is the biggest commitment, he is, apart from Nasta, the only one developing the 'QL' " Just as Roy pointed out - it all reads as if Marcel would not count at all, thats why I said both Q60 and QPC are not QLs. Your definition includes everything as you explained the correction, I understood, that's settled. :-) Cheers Jochen
