OK, now that's really ENOUGH. Could we please keep testimony about Peter Graf's character off the list (or on the QL chat list?) - and I mean ALL sides!!! I don't think any of this is relevant to SMSQ/E being licenced one way or the other.
The fact of the matter is, D&D and P.G. can do business with the current licence. If their (undisclosed as far as I can tell) developer(s?) will not develop under it, they have to take it up with their developers, or ask other people that will develop under the current licence - not require the licence to be changed for them. The more so, since once they can all get the source in their hands, most of the problems we have all read so many objections about, can be worked around, or become no-issues with a few relatively small strategical contributions. Now, If parties involved think that the answer from alternative developers to develop for the Q40 will be NO before they even ask, I think they should think about the reasons, starting from themselves. In any case, ALL of this is something that can really be done privately and off this list. Nasta
