There seems to be a lot of discussion on how e-mailers are formatting the messages. Have you considered that your e-mail readers may be presenting the e-mail as you have instructed them. If you are sending and receiving plain text the receiver should receive plain text, unless the email reader program alters it.
Lafe Tony Firshman wrote: >On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 at 21:35:35, Bill Waugh wrote: >(ref: <008301c2659c$6533eac0$862c073e@famwaugh>) > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:07 PM >>Subject: Re: [ql-users] Parcelfarce >> >> > > > >>when I send them they are correctly formatted, if you recieve them wrongly >>formmated then when you send them back they reformat correctly before I >>recieve them, or are you suggesting that OE sends them wrong and then when >>it recieve replies corrects them before it displays them. >> >> >I have no idea. >I see the original with absolutely no '>' indents at all, and I am not >the only one it seems. >My quoted text, and your reply are all with no indents. > >When I reply they are still wrongly formatted with one '>', and when you >reply to me with the second level '>>' they are _still wrongly >formatted. >I really cannot see how they can possibly arrive to you correctly >formatted. >Have a look again - I think you are simply not seeing the bad >formatting. > > >>>I agree - it makes his emails very difficult to understand. >>> >>> >>Norman was speaking of Quote marks he did'nt mention indenting >> >> >What are quote marks then - that is a new one on me. >You have snipped Norman's comment. >I have always thought quote marks in email ocntext were the '>' at the >beginning of line. > > > >>We need to ascertain what we both mean by 'Indented and 'formatted' I am >>assuming you mean the placing of an > against text, one > for every level of >>reply >> >> >Yes indeed. > > > >
