Tony Firshman wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 at 09:23:47, Norman Dunbar wrote: > (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > >>Sorry guys, I may have led you up the garden path. >> >>When I mentioned 'quotes' I was referring to 'quoting of previous text to >>which I am now replying' - basically, what has been said before. I was not >>referring to quote marks (" or ') in Bill's text - as far as I know, these >>are fine. >> >>When Bill replies to an email, the whole reply has no '>' indents/quotes >>before the lines in the original message to which Bill is replying. >> >>The example below, shows my original text indented/quoted by '>' at the >>start of the line. In this case, Bill's reply has come through correctly - >>no misunderstanding of who said what. However, in a number of his previous >>replies, there were no indent/quotes - whcih made it difficult to follw what >>was original text and what was Bill's reply. > > Yep - that is what I find exactly. > > Bill is still pretty unsure as to what is happening. > I am pretty sure he must be sending it without indents (>) but I don't > think he is convinced. > > I cannot see how _any_ mailer can strip off '>' - it just doesn't seem > logical. >
Erm... I use Mozilla these days. It strips off the '>' marks... ... and replaces them with neat, continuous vertical bars. I wonder. I can't be bothered to check, but does LookOut offer a similar function - replace '>' with neat, continous nothing. -- Lau http://www.bergbland.info Get a domain from http://oneandone.co.uk/xml/init?k_id=5165217 and I'll get the commission!
