Dave P wrote: > Just make it a standard that a toolkit looks for an existing instance > of the keyword, and if it is in use, alter the keyword in a standardised > way.
This would result in a complete mess. The semantic of a keyword depending on the order in which the extensions are loaded, no thanks. The easy and better solution is to just always add a prefix. But this is nothing one can (or should) enforce. A nice mail to the toolkit author might already be enough. Marcel
