Dax Kelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : A common complaint I hear is "qmail would use way more bandwidth, then XXX : MTA". That's obviously true, qmail does nothing to optimise on bandwidth. Let's not lose sight of the big picture: for most people the relevant performance metric isn't bandwidth but throughput. For my site, bundled rcpts would save 10% on outgoing bandwidth. Outgoing is about 50% of incoming, so I'm using about 3% over optimal (no mailing lists). I get charged by volume, and 3% isn't too shabby. For a site with mailing lists, a fair comparison would be extra qmail bandwidth versus hours spent in list management, not qmail bandwidth versus XYZ mta bandwidth. -harold
- Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Dax Kelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Richard Letts
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Justin Bell
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus ... Russ Allbery
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... johnjohn
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs
- Re: Some performance numbers ddb
- Re: Some performance numbers dirk
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- Re: Some performance numbers Sam
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
