Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So ... then if they really *care* they'll set up their own exploders. > Then instead of having to deal with N/20 copies (sendmail sends at most > 20 rcpts), they can deal with 1 copy. > The fact that they don't says that you care more than they do about > their network resources. Network resources are not consumed solely at the receiving site. Multiple RCPT mail delivery to sites like AOL consumes much less *peak* bandwidth than qmail's method. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Dax Kelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Richard Letts
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Justin Bell
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus ... Russ Allbery
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... johnjohn
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs
- Re: Some performance numbers ddb
- Re: Some performance numbers dirk
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
