On the qmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >For a site with mailing lists, a fair comparison would be extra >qmail bandwidth versus hours spent in list management, not qmail >bandwidth versus XYZ mta bandwidth. So why can't we have the best of both worlds? (I've already been called an fool for bringing this question up, but I can't see that I got a concrete answer ... cf. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) -- #include <std_disclaim.h> Lorens Kockum
- Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Dax Kelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs Richard Letts
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... Edward S. Marshall
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Justin Bell
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus ... Russ Allbery
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage ver... Russell Nelson
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTA... johnjohn
- Re: qmail bandwidth usage versus other MTAs
- Re: Some performance numbers ddb
- Re: Some performance numbers dirk
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
- Re: Some performance numbers Sam
- RE: Some performance numbers Joe Garcia
