Pike wrote:
>
> >you should install on a test box before you attempt the real thing!
> >that is common sense
>
> That would be a nice warning on the qmail homepage !
If that piece of advice comes as a surprise to you, then you deserve
every bit of trouble your users have given you.
You seem to have attempted to replace a fundamental piece of your
computing infratructure without really understanding what you're doing
and, in particular, without knowing how the new software works.
Now, if that isn't asking for trouble, I don't know what is.
R.
--
Two rules to success in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
-- Sassan Tat
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail is not a replacemen... Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail is not a re... Troy Morrison
- Re: Qmail is not ... thomas . erskine-dated-a34ed2cf3dd50a3d
- Re: Qmail is... Martin
- Re: Qmail is... Troy Morrison
- Re: Qmail is not a re... Fabrice Scemama
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Robin Bowes
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Bruce Guenter
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... johnjohn
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Sam
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Markus Stumpf
- A realistic assessment - WAS Re: Q... Doug McClure
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Pike
- RE: Qmail is not a replacement for... Michael Mansour
- Re: qmail is not a replacement for... Justin Bell
- Re: qmail is not a replacemen... Chris Green
