| I don't believe that qmail has got a steeper learning curve than | sendmail. I don't believe that most people running sendmail have much | understanding of how it works. What is perceived as a steeper learning | curve for qmail is the fact that you *are* learning how it works. This is, of course, entirely true. I neglected to point out that with regards to "steepest learning curve I've encountered in long time", I've _never_ wanted to tackle the sendmail learning curve. | *of*course* "qmail has a steeper learning curve". This is the difference | between learning .01% of sendmail as opposed to 80% of qmail. Perfectly said. Troy
- Re: Qmail is not a replacemen... Russell Nelson
- Re: Qmail is not a replacemen... Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail is not a replacemen... Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Justin Bell
- Re: Qmail is not a re... Troy Morrison
- Re: Qmail is not ... thomas . erskine-dated-a34ed2cf3dd50a3d
- Re: Qmail is... Martin
- Re: Qmail is... Troy Morrison
- Re: Qmail is not a re... Fabrice Scemama
- Re: Qmail is not a replac... Robin Bowes
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Bruce Guenter
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... johnjohn
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Sam
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Markus Stumpf
- A realistic assessment - WAS Re: Q... Doug McClure
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Pike
- Re: Qmail is not a replacement for... Pike
- RE: Qmail is not a replacement for... Michael Mansour
