On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Racer X wrote:
> There is no such thing as the "right" of a user to all the services an
> ISP provides. The user is entitled to what he's paid for. That's it.
> If the ISP wishes to charge extra for certain services, or to refuse to
> offer certain services, that's that. The customer is free to go
> elsewhere. This is not "prejudice", "racism", or any other silly term
> like that. It's "business."
That's not what we are discussing. I'm not paying you to receive my mail,
your users are paying you, so that they can receive _their_ mail. Either
them come from dial-up or not.
> For those of you who have an "unreliable" ISP who tends to lose your mail
> and still refuses to allow you outbound access - I have no sympathy for
> you. Go find another ISP. It's your own money you're wasting staying at
> the ISP who won't offer the services you want. I refuse to care about
> your own foolishness in where you spend your money. If you want a
> particular service, ask for it and offer to sign a contract with the ISP.
> If they won't do it, go elsewhere.
Obviously u never lived in a country, where monopolies are the rules, not
the exception.
> to at least some extent. We're not trying to hide our countermeasures.
> Admittedly, we don't advertise in big letters "we block spam" but if a
> customer calls and asks about our policies we'll gladly explain them. We
Why would they call you? They would call u and say, i suspect i haven't
received some mail that u deleted?
--
Tiago Pascoal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) FAX : +351-1-7273394
Politicamente incorrecto, e membro (nao muito) proeminente da geracao rasca.
