On Tue, 18 May 1999, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Feel free to roll your own patch which send's all it's stuff to syslog.
Well, I think if I hack syslog support into qmail, it won't be qmail anymore
as DJB said before.
> Anyway, who cares about inetd?
Anyone who don't want to install ucspi-tcp. You cannot say 'qmail-smtpd is
not inetd conform' because it's not true. This is a bigger issue than
patching qmail - you cannot sell a qmail-solution without move a step back
and check it's integrity. IMHO qmail itself is a robust server, without
patches. Patches can add more functionality but more weaknesses too. I
cannot belive in patches which are will remain just as patches.
> > I'd like to see if DJB himself says anything about the subject. If we want
> > logging, we should want to do it the official way.
>
> He say's use recordio.
Call me stupid but I don't know what recordio is.
--
Regards: Kevin (Balazs)
