On Thu, 20 May 1999, Jos Backus wrote: > fifo's are your friend. > > ... errorsto /my/fifo ... > > fifo /my/fifo | splogger I didn't try it out on other platforms (UnixWare 7.1 will be done), but on Linux errorsto didn't work after fifo generated the named pipe. Apparently because of waiting for the fifo process to poll out the log info. I think it's a very good solution (ie. errorsto), but it would be better if the program would be used as 'errorhandler loggerprog -arg1 -arg2 -- program -arg1 -arg2...' as in xinit. BTW as I mentioned earlier, I have compiled qmail successfully on SCO UnixWare 7.1 with *very* small changes. It's still in alpha, but if the results are good, I'll post my changes to Dan. -- Regards: Kevin (Balazs)
- Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Andre Oppermann
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Andre Oppermann
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Philip Hands
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Tommi Virtanen
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method in... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method in... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method in... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Russell Nelson
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Fred Lindberg
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Balazs Nagy
