On Sun, 23 May 1999, Jos Backus wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 08:53:42PM +0200, Balazs Nagy wrote: > > I didn't try it out on other platforms (UnixWare 7.1 will be done), but > > on Linux errorsto didn't work after fifo generated the named pipe. > > Apparently because of waiting for the fifo process to poll out the log > > info. Oh, I'm sorry. It doesn't work if I stopped fifo and wanted to use errorsto again ;) -- Regards: Kevin (Balazs)
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Andre Oppermann
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Andre Oppermann
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Philip Hands
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Tommi Virtanen
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Anand Buddhdev
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Russell Nelson
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Fred Lindberg
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Magnus Bodin
