Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient?

[Fred Lindberg]

On Tue, 18 May 1999 17:35:09 +0200 (CEST), Balazs Nagy wrote:

>Anyone who don't want to install ucspi-tcp.  You cannot say 'qmail-smtpd is
>not inetd conform' because it's not true.  This is a bigger issue than
>patching qmail - you cannot sell a qmail-solution without move a step back
>and check it's integrity.  IMHO qmail itself is a robust server, without
>patches.  Patches can add more functionality but more weaknesses too.  I
>cannot belive in patches which are will remain just as patches.

Don't patch qmail, use ucspi-tcp/daemontools. You can't blame Dan for,
after giving you a perfect solution, not being willing to make a poor
one slightly better.


-Sincerely, Fred

(Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)