On Tue, 18 May 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > Not in this one: ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/qmail/faq.html Well, I don't check that faq requlary. I use the /var/qmail/doc/FAQ. > Support was dropped for inetd configurations a few months ago. Excusez moi, but you meant 'support was dropped *from the faq*' and not from qmail. Qmail 1.03 'is shipped' with inetd support. -- Regards: Kevin (Balazs)
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Jos Backus
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Russell Nelson
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Fred Lindberg
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficient? Balazs Nagy
- Re: Is qmail's log method inefficien... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Magnus Bodin
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Is qmail's log method ineffi... Balazs Nagy
