Russell Nelson writes: > > Should qmail be backing off? Is accepting+dropping connections > > documentably wrong, that I should complain to them about it? What's the > > deal? > > Yes, it's wrong. Why are they advertising an MX if they never intend > to allow connections to it? They have a double whammy: 1) They don't have anyone with enough brains to set up split DNS. 2) They don't have anyone with enough brains to set up a mail relay with hardcoded paths. This is basically the idiot's solution to the issue of how to set up an E-mail firewall -- with bogus DNS records. -- Sam
- When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Dave Sill
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Karl Lellman
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next M... Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the n... Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to t... Jon Rust
