Jason Haar writes: > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:38:25AM -0400, Greg Owen wrote: > > Not that its my job to defend them, but I don't think its a lack of > > brains. Their system allows the actual end mail host owners, who are often > > Not only that - but I recall seeing this exact strategy mentioned in a book > on Security and Firewalls... It's still wrong. At *very* least it's a violation of the SMTP protocol. Where's the SMTP banner? -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
- When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Dave Sill
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Karl Lellman
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next... Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the... Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to... Jon Rust
- Re: When will qmail back off to... phil
- Re: When will qmail back of... Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back of... phil
- Re: When will qmail back of... Racer X
- Re: When will qmail back of... Adam D . McKenna
- Re: When will qmail back of... phil
- Re: When will qmail back of... Russell Nelson
