On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 08:38:25AM -0400, Greg Owen wrote:
> Not that its my job to defend them, but I don't think its a lack of
> brains. Their system allows the actual end mail host owners, who are often
Not only that - but I recall seeing this exact strategy mentioned in a book
on Security and Firewalls...
Let's face it, as far as I'm aware, qmail is the only MTA that doesn't do
"goto next MX if first MX timesout/fails". Put another way - over 80% of the
MTAs on the Internet today handle MX issues differently that Qmail - which
is right?
[Boy, I must be full of shi... - erm - beans - this morning!]
[donning flame-proof underpants]
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Unix/Network Specialist, Trimble NZ
Phone: +64 3 3391 377 Fax: +64 3 3391 417
- When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Dave Sill
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Karl Lellman
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- RE: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Greg Owen
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next MX? Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to the next... Jason Haar
- Re: When will qmail back off to the... Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back off to... Jon Rust
- Re: When will qmail back off to... phil
- Re: When will qmail back of... Russell Nelson
- Re: When will qmail back of... phil
- Re: When will qmail back of... Racer X
- Re: When will qmail back of... Adam D . McKenna
- Re: When will qmail back of... phil
