Thus spake Russell Nelson on Fri, May 19, 2000 at 06:58:35AM CDT > > Given the differing interpretations of bare linefeeds and > carriage-returns, they must be disallowed by the SMTP specification, > and they must not be accepted by SMTP clients or servers. Russ, thanks. How do you reconcile this with the draft spec, which appears to require that receiving systems (SMTP servers) MUST process bare linefeeds in some fashion. Do you think I'm misreading the spec, and if so, in what way? -- Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works | PGP public key FMP Computer Services | if you let it" | available at [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (The Roadie) | <http://www.fmp.com/pubkeys> http://www.fmp.com | |
- The current status of IETF drafts concerning bare linefeed... Lindsay Haisley
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concerning bare... Russell Nelson
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concerning ... Greg Hudson
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concern... Russell Nelson
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concerning ... Lindsay Haisley
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concern... Russell Nelson
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts con... Lindsay Haisley
- Re: The current status of IETF draft... Russell Nelson
- Re: The current status of IETF d... Lindsay Haisley
- Re: The current status of IETF draft... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: The current status of IETF d... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: The current status of IE... Russ Allbery
- Re: The current status of IE... Russell Nelson
- Re: The current status of IE... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: The current status of IETF drafts concerning ... Pavel Kankovsky
