On Mon, 22 May 2000, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Interpreting, and encoding are two different things. You're talking
> about interpretation of a bytestream, and Dan is talking about the
> encoding. In particular, he's dissing Content-Transfer-Encoding:
> quoted-unreadable.
Sure. But he said "non-MIME". No MIME. Neither "Content-Transfer-Encoding"
nor "Content-Type" (I am not aware of any non-hypothetical non-MIME
mechanism equivalent to Content-Type of MIME). I might be naive but I
expect people (and mathematicians in particular) to mean "X" not "some
part of X" when they say "X". :)
Flame off.
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
