I'd love to. Read my previous message. If I see some discussion about it, and enough people are actually interested, I may end up investing enough time to get this off the ground. I may not. I have four other pieces of software to write (from scratch) over the next week. John White wrote: > That's nice. Where's your implementation? I don't mind testing your > patches to qmail if you'll send them to me. Incidentally, is there a discussion in the past that I've missed about 'void main' declarations? :-)
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... markd
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Eric Cox
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Joe Kelsey
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Mark Mentovai
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Paul Jarc
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Petr Novotny
- Re: void main Jan Echternach
