Re: void main (no, not a long one)

[Paul Jarc]

Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theoretically, "void main" is wrong. In practice, it works just
> fine. Personally, I could not care less.

Theoretically, BIND's noncompliance with standards is wrong.  In
practice, it interoperates with most of the world (i.e., itself) just
fine.  But I care.


paul