On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 04:18:21PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > You've just missed a point of Qmail though. If a major point of Qmail's existence is > to provide reliable E-mail delivery, then this _must_ include cooperating with other > MTAs (without violating standards) at least enough to keep from crashing / giving > them headaches so that we don't 'encourage' them to lose mail ... (through failures > of their own). Sorry, but no. Reliability is preserved. If the remote mailer is not available, for whatever reason, qmail will queue the mail and retry again later. --Adam
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Petr Novotny
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... markd
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Eric Cox
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Joe Kelsey
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb rel... Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Mark Mentovai
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Paul Jarc
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
