[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I don't see how "If there is ever a compiler dumb enough to break >void main(), I will happily advise everyone to use a different >compiler" engenders any trust in someone's ability to write C code. The proof of Dan's pudding is in the eating. Theoretically, "void main" is wrong. In practice, it works just fine. Personally, I could not care less. Please stop trying to make mountains out of old, dead molehills. If you have a serious, practical problem, we'll be glad to help. -Dave
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Eric Cox
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Joe Kelsey
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Adam McKenna
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Mark Mentovai
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! John White
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Mark Mentovai
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Paul Jarc
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Dave Sill
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Michael T. Babcock
- Re: void main (no, not a long one) Petr Novotny
- Re: void main Jan Echternach
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relaying! Paul Jarc
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: orbs.org accuses qmail of mailbomb relayin... Paul Jarc
