On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 13:39:01 -0500 (EST), Russell Nelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Johan Almqvist writes:
> > If the QMTP connection fails (because the remote host doesn't have a qmtpd
> > running
>That's a misconfiguration. I'd rather that the email bounced than it
>got delivered via SMTP silently. It could be that someone unaware of
What happens in the following case:
quadpro.stupendous.org 86323 MX 12801 a.mx.quadpro.stupendous.org
quadpro.stupendous.org 86323 MX 12817 b.mx.quadpro.stupendous.org
...when qmtpd isn't reachable on a.mx.quadpro.stupendous.org?
>delivered via qmtpd but it is failing to run for some reason. If we
>fall back to smtp, they'll never know that it's failing unless they're
>watching their qmail logs carefully.
But isn't that a bit in contradiction with the concept of backup
MX'es?
end
--
Jurjen Oskam * carnivore! * http://www.stupendous.org/ for PGP key
assassinate nuclear iraq clinton kill bomb USA eta ira cia fbi nsa kill
president wall street ruin economy disrupt phonenetwork atomic bomb sarin
nerve gas bin laden military -*- DVD Decryption at www.stupendous.org -*-
