Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch

[Russell Nelson]

David Dyer-Bennet writes:
 > Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 January 2001 at 17:24:13 -0500
 > 
 >  >   And, since MXPS is not an accepted Internet standard, the (unlikely,
 >  > but possible) situation where somebody has chosen an MX priority which
 >  > isn't MXPS-compatible should be handled gracefully.
 > 
 > I think that's the clinching argument; it's vital that people using MX
 > in full accordance with the RFCs who happen to hit our magic numbers
 > not get screwed.

Why not ask him to change his MX number?  There can be at most one
host which has port 209 bound AND an MX priority in the 12800-13056
range.

-- 
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://russnelson.com | Government is the
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | fictitious entity by which
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | everyone seeks to live at
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | everyone else's expense.