Scott Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 15 January 2001 at 17:24:13 -0500 > And, since MXPS is not an accepted Internet standard, the (unlikely, > but possible) situation where somebody has chosen an MX priority which > isn't MXPS-compatible should be handled gracefully. I think that's the clinching argument; it's vital that people using MX in full accordance with the RFCs who happen to hit our magic numbers not get screwed. -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED] SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
- Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Jurjen Oskam
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Scott Gifford
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc p... Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qm... Scott Gifford
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Johan Almqvist
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc patch Russell Nelson
- Re: Possible problem with qmail-qmtpc p... Peter van Dijk