Johan Almqvist writes: > Quoting http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt Don't believe everything you read. :-) My original design made QMTP-only mail exchangers easier but made QMTP+SMTP mail exchangers harder. This was a bad tradeoff. Clients should interpret a QMTP priority as ``try QMTP, then try SMTP.'' Then a typical SMTP host that adds QMTP support can keep its single MX record but change the priority. ---Dan
- QMTP MX-question Jurjen Oskam
- Re: QMTP MX-question Johan Almqvist
- Re: QMTP MX-question Jurjen Oskam
- Re: QMTP MX-question Henning Brauer
- Re: QMTP MX-question D. J. Bernstein
- Re: QMTP MX-question Vincent Schonau
- Re: QMTP MX-question Peter van Dijk
- Re: QMTP MX-question Russell Nelson
- Re: QMTP MX-question Peter van Dijk