D. J. Bernstein writes:
> Johan Almqvist writes:
> > Quoting http://cr.yp.to/proto/mxps.txt
>
> Don't believe everything you read. :-)
>
> My original design made QMTP-only mail exchangers easier but made
> QMTP+SMTP mail exchangers harder. This was a bad tradeoff.
>
> Clients should interpret a QMTP priority as ``try QMTP, then try SMTP.''
> Then a typical SMTP host that adds QMTP support can keep its single MX
> record but change the priority.
If I understand correctly, this is the way Russ has implemented it, and I
think it is an important clarification of mxps.txt. Would you consider
updating that document to reflect this?
Also, since a number of people are now running QMTP *and* MXPS, are you
going to do this for cr.yp.to as well?
Thanks,
Vince.
