Pavel Kankovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, how old qmail 1.03 is? CHANGES in qmail-1.03.tar.gz say it was > released on June 15 1998. Hmm...this predates the change in question > (January 11 1999), doesn't it? http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c Revision 1.20; dated Feb 28 1998. Please, stop now. -- Dan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://danp.net
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Virginia Chism
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- The joy of Qmail qmail
- Re: The joy of Qmail Charles Cazabon
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Dave Sill
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... paul
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Dan Peterson
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Scott Gifford
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Greg Owen
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Paul Jarc
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Greg White
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Scott Gifford