Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of 0.0.0.0 or127.0.0.1)

[Vince Vielhaber]

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Pavel Kankovsky wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Dan Peterson wrote:
>
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
> > Revision 1.20; dated Feb 28 1998.
>
> Hmm...hmm...right. Ok, I missed it. It did not occur to me 0.0.0.0 is a
> broadcast address in Canada. :)
>
> Anyway, qmail 1.00 was released on February 20, 1997. Was there any
> handling for 0.0.0.0 in qmail 1.00?

Now that's lame.  That statement would only have relevance if 1.00 was a
current release and it's not even close.  Drop it already.

Vince.
-- 
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.pop4.net
 128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
        Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com
       Online Giftshop Superstore    http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================