On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Dan Peterson wrote: > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c > Revision 1.20; dated Feb 28 1998. Hmm...hmm...right. Ok, I missed it. It did not occur to me 0.0.0.0 is a broadcast address in Canada. :) Anyway, qmail 1.00 was released on February 20, 1997. Was there any handling for 0.0.0.0 in qmail 1.00? --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- The joy of Qmail qmail
- Re: The joy of Qmail Charles Cazabon
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Patrick Bihan-Faou
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Dave Sill
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... paul
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Dan Peterson
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Scott Gifford
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Greg Owen
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX reco... Scott Gifford
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX ... Paul Jarc
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an... Greg White
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Peter van Dijk
- Re: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handlin... Scott Gifford
- RE: Subtle qmail bug? (was Re: Handling an MX record of... Greg Owen