> As it is, if something goes wrong with spamc, all your mail will defer. > With the exception line it will be delivered properly (without spamass > tagging/filtering). > Wouldn't it be better in the case of spam and virus filtering to defer the message delivery rather than allow it through without acting on it?
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Swergar Tsang
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Alan Murrell
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Charles Sprickman
- [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working Examp... Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... spork
- RE: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Benjamin Tomhave
- RE: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... spork
- RE: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Benjamin Tomhave
- RE: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... spork
- RE: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Benjamin Tomhave
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Jeff Hedlund
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Jeff Hedlund
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... Chris Hallgren
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Working E... spork
- Re: [qmailadmin] SpamAssassin Chris Hallgren
- [qmailadmin] Using Qmail/FreeBSD as front-end server Steve Schofield
- Re: [qmailadmin] Using Qmail/FreeBSD as front-end s... Jonathan Viney
