On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Benjamin Tomhave wrote: > > As it is, if something goes wrong with spamc, all your mail will defer. > > With the exception line it will be delivered properly (without spamass > > tagging/filtering). > > > Wouldn't it be better in the case of spam and virus filtering to defer the > message delivery rather than allow it through without acting on it?
For some, maybe, for me, no, and for someone just starting to learn this entire mish-mash of stuff, no. It also depends on your client base. Do they mind losing all of their mail for hours if something goes wrong? Charles
