Thanks Eric 'shubes' Now most of the spam messages are getting blocking, along with that many false positives too, sometimes it is tiresome. Is there any good suggestions please?
-Nic > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:04:25 -0700 > Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke > > nicole thomson wrote: > > Is there a way to send all these rejected emails to a particular account, > > so that until we update the whitelist_senders, ip, it will be safe to > > receive the original mails rather than rejecting them? > > I don't think so, at least not that I'm aware of. > > I think you'll have to simply not use the RBLs (and whatever other > spamdyke filters you deem risky) until you can get your whitelist put > together, and live with the spam. I hope that your server can handle all > of the scanning spamassassin will be doing with the absence of > spamdyke's filtering. It will definitely be under a larger load without > the spamdyke filtering. > > Note, if you decide to turn off spamdyke entirely, you'll need to > maintain any RBLs you choose (not) to use by editing the > /var/qmail/control/blacklists file. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group > (www.vickersconsulting.com) > Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. > If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > _________________________________________________________________ New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. http://windows.microsoft.com/shop
