Thanks eric

Now i increased the timeouts from 600 to 6000, let me wait and see does it 
needs tobe increased more, also i subscribed in spamdyke users mailing list. 
Will update the happenings frequently

--Nic

> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:50:28 -0700
> Subject: [qmailtoaster]  Re: Fine tuning qmail+spamdyke - continuation   with 
> my previous mail
> 
> nicole thomson wrote:
> > 
> > also in smtp/current i could see lots of TIMEOUT
> > 
> > @400000004b21e0ca03ac29a4 spamdyke[29507]: TIMEOUT from: 
> > [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 
> > 78.129.199.225 origin_rdns: mail1.arrowmail.co.uk auth: (unknown) 
> > reason: TIMEOUT
> 
> You might need to increase the timeout limit in spamdyke, especially if 
> there might be network congestion anywhere between the sending and 
> receiving servers.
> 
> > @400000004b1df18e1c8961bc.s:@400000004b1d283c1d694a0c spamdyke[23866]: 
> > DENIED_RBL_MATCH from: validemai...@pcisecurity_xxxxx.org 
> > <mailto:[email protected]> to: [email protected] 
> > origin_ip: 74.53.136.146 origin_rdns: ruby2.fastnix.com auth: (unknown)
> > 
> > spamhaus lookup as follows
> > IP Address Lookup
> > 
> >             *74.53.136.146 is not listed in the SBL*
> > *74.53.136.146 is not listed in the PBL*
> > 
> > *74.53.136.146 is not listed in the XBL*
> > 
> > 
> > Similar to this many mails were getting bounced, even if it is a 
> > business enquiry with valid contents and without listing in spamhaus
> > 
> 
> This one appears to be a bug of some sort. I haven't seen this behavior 
> before that I'm aware of.
> 
> I'm sure that Sam (spamdyke author) will have further insight. Please 
> post this to the spamdyke users list (see 
> http://spamdyke.org/mailinglists.html) for resolution.
> 
> -- 
> -Eric 'shubes'
> 
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
New Windows 7: Simplify what you do everyday. Find the right PC for you.
http://windows.microsoft.com/shop

Reply via email to