I know - but of the toaster recipes - this is one that works for VPS.
*David Bray* http://www.brayworth.com.au da...@brayworth.com.au On 26/05/2011 9:42 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: > Interesting, David. Thanks. > Doesn't change my mind though. ;) > > On 05/25/2011 04:36 PM, David Bray wrote: >> Hi Eric, just to stop you wondering .... >> >> Truly - I am VPS all the way ... >> >> A number of years back I was hosting everything on the end of my ADSL >> line, after years of hosting on the end of 64k ISDN, Satelite >> connections etc .. the speed when ADSL came about was nice. It was >> business grade ADSL 512k/512k and had a Service Level Aggreement - >> pretty good and reliable. I was overseas and lightning took out the >> transformer at the end of the street, along with the UPS and popped the >> power supply - I never conceived that would happen. After a lengthy >> phone call to my Electrician Uncle in Law - who had the keys to the >> house and was at least an electrician and assuring him it wasn't that >> hard - hey how bad is not working at all. ..... >> >> Now - I have no hardware - was it Forest Gump who said, "one less thing >> to worry about ...." >> >> *David Bray* >> http://www.brayworth.com.au >> da...@brayworth.com.au >> >> On 24/05/2011 8:35 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: >>> Thanks for clearing that up, David. >>> >>> I do wonder why people look to hosting providers for installing QMT. >>> You can run a small QMT domain on a PII-266MH w/ 512M (that was my >>> first QMT host). QMT really doesn't take much to run, especially with >>> spamdyke installed. Building the rpms may take a little while, but so >>> what? With qtp-newmodel, the server is still online while the rpms >>> build. You can even run one on a dynamic IP address, provided you use >>> a service such as DynDNS for dynamic DNS services and outbound email >>> (smarthost) relay. >>> >>> To each his own though. I realize that self hosting isn't always >>> practical, although it is more so than many seem to realize. >>> > >
