Hi all, Am 14.10.2014 um 20:54 schrieb woprandi: > After around one year developpement (no full-time) I'm satisfied about > Qooxdoo. The migration is not terminated but the app now has over 10k lines > of code. And qooxdoo is well suitable for our need to write big business > application. > > My main reproach to the framework is about the Table widget, which seems to > be an "old-gen" widget with few limitations (no data-binding, no cell > widget, filtered model limited, ...) and unfortunetely it does not seem to > change anytime soon. And we handle lot of data so the Table widget is the > most used widget. We do not have other major problem with other > widgets/components. > > I don't understand why compare Angular and Qooxdoo. Angular is more > "low-end" framework useful to write small standalone app and not suitable to > handle lot of data unlike Qooxdoo.
+1 from me. We have a heavy qx.desktop application online (the German Resuscitation Registry http://www.reanimationsregister.de). We had to workarround the limitations of the table widget by encapsulating it into another widget, where the table is re-created if the column and cell formater structure changes. And as Williasm said: I don't see how Angular and ember could have been an alternative for our project. Regards Dietrich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
