I voted MoinMoin because I've used it before and liked it, I don't know much about confluence.
If we can get benefits from confluence then it might be worth moving. Can we set up a QPIDDOC cwiki for starters and try using it to generate some docs? If it works and we love it we can ditch moinmoin and set up a QPID Cwiki. If it's great for docs but not for general use use we can keep both. Seems like it's normal practice to have separate doc & devel wikis anyway, so it's not a disaster if we have 2 different kinds of wiki - obviously it'd be better if one is clearly superior and to lower usage confusion. On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 14:03 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote: > > I would then like to see a vote on this change as those that promoted > MoinMoin have > been silent on this thread. > > > Please speak up now if you are going to.... > > > Carl. > > > Cliff Schmidt wrote: > > On 9/22/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Cliff set up MoinMoin for us based on a vote that was taken. > >> http://wiki.apache.org/qpid/ > >> > >> I have sent him a mail to understand the impact it we decide to change. > > > > Aside from possibly annoying some poor infrastructure guy who has to > > set up yet a second wiki due to our fickleness ;-)..... I don't think > > it's a major issue to change. > > > > I don't mind making the request (once you guys are sure), but anyone > > can also follow my MoinMoin Jira issue as an example to request the > > Confluence wiki after there's been consensus among the committers. > > > > Cliff >
